DNA – A Moral Dilemma?




Untangling family trees can be like untangling Christmas lights, and it’s very easy to become impatient and want to scream and/or punch something.  This is nothing new and we’ve all been there.

Back in the day, people had no idea DNA could catch up to them and possibly “out” their secrets.  Well, that day has definitely arrived.  But even with the DNA results of today, the lies told on birth certificates, marriage records, etc., ensure there will be days when you just want to throw your hands in the air and wave the white flag.

A 1st cousin shows up unexpectedly on your DNA matches.  But…….you don’t have any 1st cousins!!!  So, naturally you reach out via ancestry.com, but he does not answer you back.  Crickets, radio silence, nada, nothing.  So, you find a way to telephone him and he hangs up on you, BUT not before asking you to text him what you want.  So you text him, and he reluctantly (imagine a turtle) texts you back and tells you what he knows, intermittently and over the course of about 6 months, which unfortunately is almost nothing.  A year goes by, he texts you again out of the blue and this time he says he’s got paperwork to send you.  Excitedly, you tell him where to mail said paperwork.  But, another year goes by, and you hear nothing, and he never sends you any paperwork, so you dive in.  Again.  I tried to explain to him how to make his DNA results private so people like me wouldn’t find him, but he refused my help. 








There’s a reason he’s left his DNA results public.  He won’t or can’t admit he wants to know about his parents, but he obviously wants to know.

Everything about this 1st cousin’s father seems to be a lie – his birth record, his own marriage record(s) and even his social security application.  Perhaps his mother simply lied to him her whole life and he never really knew who his biological father was.   A tale as old as time……..

 If his mother lied about his birth, was it because the secret was hurtful or harmful?  Should I butt out?  Genealogists only butt in, not out!  Should I just let things be?  But, if our clients want to know about their families, don’t they have the right to know?  Is DNA really such a great thing?  If you yourself really do not want to connect with unknown relatives, why not privatize your results???    

Currently, I am still in the middle of a huge tangled mess of family lies, but at least for today, I am not giving up…….



How to Save Your Tree from Ancestry.com to Your Personal Computer. Don't Lose Any of Your Hard Work !

We have been working with Ancestry.com trees for many years, and have tips for how to save all of your hard work so that you don't lose any records.  Also, you want to take ownership of everything you find.  This includes Media, such as Census Records, Vital Records, and Military Records through the Ancestry.com Collections.


  • If you build a tree on Ancestry.com, you can only research their collections if you pay for a membership.  Also, if you cancel your membership at a later date, you will not be able to open up these saved Ancestry.com documents until you pay again.  It will only show the Citation.
  • The good news is that any photo or document that you personally upload to an ancestor's profile page (in the gallery section) is yours to view any time.  
  • We recommend that you buy the software program Family Tree Maker (FTM) and sync your tree, with all the media attached, to your hard drive.  Once you do that, it is yours forever.

  • If you hire a genealogist to build out your family tree, and they own your tree on their Ancestry.com account, you should have them download the tree (with media) to their own FTM software.  Once they do that, then you can give them your Ancestry.com Login and Password and have them Upload the Tree to YOUR Ancestry.com account.  

  • The tree will now exist in your Account, with the media.  You can then follow the step above to sync this tree to your personal FTM software on your hard drive.
  • If you export a GEDCOM file of your tree, the media does NOT come with it.  That is why syncing to the FTM software is key. 
  • The Media is one of the most important things for you to make sure you retain for future generations.  



A Chicago City Lamplighter in 1903


Charles Driscoll, the Young Lamplighter

  • The pay was lousy, and so were the hours.
  • We had to go out twice a day, once to light the lamps in the evening and then to put them out in the early morning.
  • I had as many as 120 lamps to light, and my pay was between $12 and $16 a month, which the boss gave to my mother.





One time it was 18 below zero for a full week. "I was bundled up as if I was going to the Klondike."  Charles Driscoll (1960)


Charles Driscoll, who was born in Chicago in 1891 and died in Florida in 1980, spent three or four of his teenage years as a lamplighter, working with gas streetlights on the west side of Chicago. His career was ended by his need for better paying work and also by the installation of electric lights. He tells of his experiences as a lamplighter in a recorded interview, which is available at the Chicago Historical Society library or at the University of Illinois (Springfield) in its Oral History collection.. The interview was conducted in 1973 by his nephew, Thomas Driscoll, of Peoria , IL. The drawing is reproduced by courtesy of the St. Petersburg, FL, Times, which published a story about Charles Driscoll in 1977, when he was living in Gulfport, FL. The drawing was made by Times artist Jack Barrett.
                                            

The Interview
     When Charles Driscoll gave this interview in Florida in June, 1973, he was 81 years old, but still active and vigorous. A widower without children, he had moved to Florida in 1969 with his brother, Edward, and Edward’s wife, Helen. Until then he had lived in Chicago, where he was born in 1891. Before he retired he did office work for several different employers, including the Continental Bank in the Loop and Harold Pitman Co., a producer of engraving supplies, in Cicero. During his lamplighting years he lived at 3006 W. Fillmore St., near the corner of Fillmore and Sacramento Blvd. The text of the interview has been lightly edited to eliminate duplication and enhance clarity.

Q. When were you a lamplighter in Chicago?
A. From 1903 to 1907.
Q. How old were you then?
A. I was between 12 and 15.
Q. How big an area did you have?
A. I had about half mile east and west and a quarter mile north and south.
Q. On what streets?
A. Madison, Monroe, Wilcox and Adams - north and south. And from Rockwell street to Sacramento avenue. On the west side of Chicago.
Q. How did you get a job like that?
A. The man I worked for was a friend of the alderman. And the alderman let out these contracts to fellows, and they would hire kids to light the lamps.
Q. Would you have asked him for a job?
A. No, he would come around the neighborhood to find kids maybe that had paper routes or something, who were out early in the morning, who were maybe working milk trucks or something like that, figuring that they wouldn't mind getting up early in the morning to put the lights out.
Q.You didn't have to be a good Democrat or Republican?
A. Oh, no. Politics had nothing to do with it.
Q. Did any of your brothers have a lamplighting job?
A. Yes, Pat, Frank and John. They were my older brothers. Frank lit about five years, that was the longest, and I lit about four and a half.
Q. Is that the way you talk of it - I lit for so many years?
A. Well, I'm talking about lighting and putting them out or extinguishing them. Lighting them and putting them out. That was the terms used.
Q. Did you take over the job from Frank?
A. Yes. Or if the boss had more lights and a bigger route, and some kids weren't reliable enough, he'd ask us if we'd take over that kid's route. And he'd let that kid go. He'd fire him. If we were good workers he'd always want to add on 30 to 40 more lamps, which meant a little more money.
Q. How much was your pay?
A. The highest was $16 a month, and the lowest was about $12.
Q. How many lamps would there have been on your route?
A. Well, the most lamps I lit was maybe 120, and the least number about 80.
Q. So it varied?
A. Yes. An 80 lamp route paid $12 a month, and 130 or 140 lamps $16. I never heard of anybody making more than that. That took care of lighting them and putting them out.
Q, How did that compare with other jobs, like a paper route? Did it pay better or about the same?
A. About the same, I would say.
Q. It wasn't an especially high-paying job then?
A. No, no. It was a very poor paying job. You had to pay for your own wicks that you burned in your torch, and you had to buy your own kerosene to put into your torch.
Q. Where did you get that stuff?
A. First, we started out by using that material that's used in mops, used to mop up floors and so on. Then we found out that that stuff wore out too fast. Then I used to buy the wicking at the Fair Store downtown in Chicago. We'd get wicks seven or eight inches long and get a little piece of piping from a hardware store and put that into your thing and screw into your torch. And that would make the light last a long time. Sometimes you wouldn't have to put a new wick in for six months. Just pull up the wicking every once in a while. You didn't have to have it up too much or it would burn the wicking out too quick.
Q. When you lit lamps was your torch burning all the time?
A. Yes. You had your torch burning all the time.
Q. And then how did you turn the gas jet on in the lamp?
A. There was a cross T up inside of the head in the lamp posts. Some of them were square and others had a round, more up-to-date, shade on them. But most of them were square. But they had a key in there. And you'd come along with your torch and you turned your key up there. And it'd go poof as soon as your light came in contact with the gas.
Q. In other words you'd turn it on and light it all in the same motion because your torch would be lit?
A. Yes, just like you were turning a key on your gas stove. And you'd get your torch up there and shove it up that way. And as soon as you did that the gas would come up the pipe and poof and light. And put it out in the morning you'd get your stick in there. You didn't have your lighted torch then. You had a stick. You'd come along in the morning and get ahold of this end of the key and push it up this way, and that'd shut the lamp off.Q. And then when did you have to light them, what time of day?
A. You had a timetable. And in the wintertime you had to be out at about a quarter to four, about 3:45 because you know it gets dark early in the winter. You had to be out on your route about 3:45 at the earliest. And you'd be through about 4:15 or 4:30, something like that. You weren't supposed to go out and light the lamps when the sun was shining. The sun was supposed to be down, almost all the way down.
Q. Otherwise you'd be wasting gas, right?
A. Yes. That's why you had the timetable. In the summertime the days were longer. Of course daylight saving wasn't known then. And in the summertime you'd go out as late as a quarter to seven at night, 6:45. That would be three hours later than the winter. That would be your earliest to go out. A quarter to seven, and get them out anywhere from 7:15 to 7:30 in the wintertime. And in the summertime you'd be out earlier in the morning to put them out. You went out at 3:30 in the morning. You leave the house about 3:30 in the morning in the summertime. In the wintertime you left about 5:30.
Q. How long would it take you to do the whole route?
A. From the time you leave the house and be back to your route, sometimes your route was anywhere from a half a mile to a mile away from your house. And by the time you got back you were gone from an hour and a half to two hours.
Q. Was the gas flame all that there was to provide the illumination?
A. Well at first, but they improved the lamps by putting the Welsbach mantles in them. But they were very delicate. You had to be very careful to put your stick up because if you were very rough at all you would break the mantle.
Q. Did the mantle give more light, was that the idea?
A. It was a much whiter light. Before that, when you had only the flame, it was a fiery color. Before the Welsbach came, you had different tips that went on the gas pipe. First they had a bone tip that went in, and then they came in with an aluminum tip. Then came the Welsbach mantles. And then, after that they put in the electric lights. That knocked the gas guys out of a job. Madison street was the first one to knock me out.
Q. What year was that?
A. Oh, that was 1903 of 1904, something like that. I was born in 1891 so nine more years would make it 1900, and I was lighting lamps when I was 12 years old or 11. So it was somewhere around 1903 or so, 1904, 1905, 1906.
Q. Were there a couple of lamps in every block, or just on every corner, or what?
A. On the corner and in the middle of the block. Say this is a street here. Here's a corner. There's a lamp here, and here's an alley going through here. At this alley here's another lamp. And then down here is another street and there's a lamp here. So there would be three -- corner here on this street, corner this street, and at the alley over here.  And then, in addition to lighting and putting the lamps out, I had to make a report of any broken glass in lamps. And in the wintertime they'd freeze. Frost would get down in those gas pipes and freeze them.
Q. What would you do then?
A. Pour alcohol down there.
Q. Did you do that?
A. No, the boss did. But he wanted me to carry the ladder around. Or if I didn't carry the ladder, to carry three- to a five-gallon can of alcohol with a little cup on it. And he'd put the ladder up the thing and I'd pour out the alcohol and he'd unscrew the cap of the lamp and pour the alcohol down it.
Q. What would that do?
A. Yes. If there was any ice down in that stem, why it will thaw it out. Sometimes the lamp didn't thaw out the first day. Sometimes it'd take two days before that alcohol took effect. And you'd be surprised. You'd go along there the next night, sticking your torch up. No light. And then all of a sudden you'd go along some night and touch it and whoof! One time the whole thing blew up. It was an eruption. There was a leak somewhere. The whole top blew off.
Q.The glass and everything broke?
A. Blew the whole top of the lamp off. Once there was some tomboy girl who wanted to around the route with me  -- Liz Kelly. And the first lamp was like in the middle of the block, like in an alley. I gave her the torch. I said, "All right, there's the lamp." She said she knew how to light lamps. It was one of those lamps; she stuck the torch and the explosion blew up the lamp. She dropped the torch and ran home. That was the last I saw of her.
Q. Would you ever miss a day of lamplighting? I mean, you'd have to light every day of the week, right?
A. Yes, every day.
Q. What happened if you were sick?
A. You had to get your brother, if you had a brother who knew something about it, or report it to the boss. He'd have to go out and hire somebody. Every kid didn't know how to light lamps. But the boss was supposed to know something about it. Some of them didn't know a damn thing.
Q. They were just political appointees?
A. Sure. It would be nothing for those guys to get two or three hundred dollars from the city hall, from the alderman, and they'd pay us kids anywhere from 12 to 16 dollars a month, and the rest was shoved in their pocket. The city supplied them with glass, but they'd have to install it in the broken lamps. And they supplied them with the alcohol to thaw the lamps out. That's about the extent. They were supposed to go around and clean the windows.
Q. What else do you remember happening?
A. Drunks would be out in the morning, especially on Saturday night or Sunday morning. They'd be walking home with their girls, and you would be putting the light out, and they'd say, "Don't put that light out." Otherwise, they'd say, they couldn't find their way home. "If you put that light out we'll get you." I put it out anyhow. Some of them were too drunk to chase you.
Q. What about bullies? Any other kids picking on you?
A. No, no. Nothing like that. Nobody was out that early in the morning.
Q. But what about in the afternoon when you were lighting?
A. No, nobody. Lots of the kids would like for you to let them take a torch and light a lamp. That'd satisfy them. That was great to have the honor of sticking a torch up there to light a lamp. But the people all along the route would speak to you. Many a time a person would ask me to come up on their porch and have a big glass of lemonade or some homemade root beer or something like that.
Q. Were there streetcars running in those days?
A. Yes, there were. In the early morning hours they had horses pulling the streetcars. Horses. Until five o'clock in the morning. And then the cable cars came on.
Q. Did you ride any of them?
A. Sometimes in the wintertime. I'd get in there. They had hay. The motorman would be driving those teams of horses, and they had hay on the floor. I'd go get on the back end and sit down and ride a half a mile on the thing, riding home. That was on Madison street. That's the only street that had cable cars or the horse cars.
Q. What else do you remember?
A. Oh, there were lots of stories connected with the lamplighters. I was putting out one of my last lamps one time when a picture frame factory on Polk Street and Washington Avenue caught fire. The whole roof exploded. Boy! A saloon keeper on the corner came out in his pajamas. "What was that?" he said. I said, "The picture frame factory; the whole roof exploded." It was a half hour before the first fire department came. I stayed around there for a while. I had to get back and get some sleep. I had to go to school.
Q. Oh, so you went home and went back to bed?
A. Yes. It was kind of hard getting up early in the morning at three o'clock, three thirty.
Q. Did you have your own alarm clock?
A. No, my mother was the alarm clock. She had the clock. Otherwise we'd never get up. She used to say that she was the alarm clock. I remember my father saying he wouldn't get up for any amount of money. She said, "Well, that's the difference between you and me." She said, "You'll never have the debt paid off on the house if I don't have the boys out lighting lamps."
Q. So she got the money you were paid?
A. Yes, the fellow we worked for, he wouldn't give it to us. He'd come to the house and give the money to my mother.
Q. It was a hard job, wasn't it?
A. Well, especially the hours, the business of getting up at 3:30 or so. You don't have to get up that early with a paper route. And of course you have to do it every day of the week. And go out twice a day. It didn't make any difference whether the temperature was 99 or 100; you had to get out and light the lamps that night. And I had one week when it was 18 below zero for a full week.
Q. And did you walk your route even then?
A. Sure. I would be bundled up as if I was going to the Klondike. I'd have paper lined around my stockings, and then I had Russian boots on and underwear. Maybe two sets of underwear. Heavy corduroy pants, two pairs of mitts, a stocking cap, scarfs, mufflers. My mother fixed up a fascinator under my mouth. It just fit under your nose. And then the steam from your mouth would come out there and come up in your eyes and form icicles on your eyelashes.
Q. What caused you to give up lamplighting?
A. They put in electricity. It ran us out of business. It started on Madison street and then came to Monroe. And then one by one about every six months. First they put the poles in, see, and then they wouldn't be connected for three or four months. Madison was a very principal street, so naturally it was first. Then they got the other main streets like Kedzie, Halsted and so on. They were all electrified. And that was the end of lamplighting.


Where was my Irish GG Grandmother born ?


Ellen Heffernan is my great great grandmother.  That much I know for sure.  But beyond that, I cannot figure out a single thing about her life in Ireland, including her parents, siblings, and where in Ireland she was born. 

It has been a frustrating bunch of years trying to write her life story.   I tire of using the phrase Brick Wall.  Quite frankly, she is not a brick, nor a wall.  She is my Direct Ancestor, whom I share her name. 

So thus, I am sharing my research to date, and asking for suggestions and ideas for what I have missed and where I go next.  I am thinking that I am too close to her story and am missing a clue.

  1. Her death certificate says she was born May, 1829 in Ireland.  No parents were listed.  Figures.
  2. Her obituary says she came to the US at the age of 14 with her parents, but they failed to name her parents (grrrrr).  This puts her immigration around 1843.  An Immigration Record has not been found because it was a few years before the great migration, and records are sparse.  Also, there are many Ellen Heffernan’s coming to the US in the 1840’s.  Who knew……..
  3. Now I know her parents came to America with her.  But where they are is a mystery as well.
  4. Ellen married John O’Connor sometime around 1851 and they lived in Seymour, Connecticut. 
  5. I cannot for the life of me find Ellen in the 1850 census.  I found John in Chicopee, Massachusetts as a single man with his sister and 4 brothers, but Ellen does not appear to be living in that area.
  6. No marriage record has been found.  I went thru the Chicopee town records by hand, and the Catholic Church records in Connecticut, but nothing.
  7. Her first born baby was a girl named Bridget born in Seymour Connecticut and baptized at St. Mary’s Derby, CT.  Ellen and John clearly followed the traditional naming patterns of the Irish, so I am 100% confident that this is her mother’s name.  However, her father’s name is unclear.  Their first born son was David, and that is John’s father.  Second born son was named John, which usually the 3rd born son is named after the baby’s father, and 2nd born after the Mother’s father.  So was baby John named after the father, or Ellen’s father, or both?  Or was there a baby that died at birth?   Based on the fact that she had a baby almost every year, there is a window where another son could have been born.
  8. There was another Heffernan living in Seymour, Connecticut.  His name was Patrick Heffernan and I did find his marriage record in 1855 at the approximate age of 37.  Ellen is not a witness to the marriage.  She does not appear to be a sponsor to any of Patrick’s children.  However, there is a Patrick Halloren as a witness to baby John.  Was this a misspelling for Heffernan?  Patrick’s marriage record at the Derby Courthouse says he was born in Limerick.  I doubt this was his first marriage but I cannot connect the dots to another one.
  9. There is an Ann Heffernan living as a servant in Seymour, Connecticut in the 1850 census.  At first, I thought this was Ellen, thinking the census taker misunderstood her when she spoke her name.  That is until I found the marriage of Ann Heffernan and James Plunkett in 1851.  Is Ann a sister?  Ann goes missing along with her husband and son after the 1860 census.
  10. Ellen spent up to 40 years in the Connecticut Valley Hospital from 1873 to her death in 1916.  Now you see why I am obsessed with figuring out her life??   Diagnosis was melancholy from having too many babies (at least 12 that I know of).  The hospital exists today and they sent me her medical records from 1873 – 1886, but no clues help define her past other than her condition was hereditary.  Gee thanks, that’s helpful.
  11. Baby Bridget’s sponsors were Michael Heffernan and Mary Gannon.  I am confident these are siblings.  Mary Gannon has been elusive to find.  As for Michael, would you believe there were 2 Michael Heffernan’s that died in Derby CT.  One in 1899 and the other in 1900.  The first died as a pauper in a poor house, having lost his wife, child and house, and father was listed as Michael Heffernan on the D/C.  The 2nd died as a widow, before the 1900 census was taken, but father was listed as James Heffernan, and James is buried in the same cemetery as his son.  I tend to think her brother was the first one that died as a pauper.  His obit says he had a sister Bridget Heffernan who lived in New Haven.  Ellen wasn’t listed, but then Ellen had been in the hospital for over 20 years at this point.  Were they embarrassed to name her, or had they forgotten about her?  God I hate this journey at this point.
  12. James Heffernan, father of Michael Heffernan, has the parish of Glenroe County Limerick on his headstone.  But guess what?  Church records for Glenroe don’t start until 1850.  I even visited the church on my trip to Ireland in 2012, but there wasn’t a single Heffernan Headstone at the Glenroe cemetery.  I still wonder about Glenroe, because it is all of 15 miles from where John O’Connor was born.
  13. Ellen’s last baby was born in 1874, the year after she was admitted to the hospital for the first time and then sent home 2 months later.  Margaret O’Connor was raised by her sisters (including my great grandmother) since her mother was in the hospital for her entire childhood.  I have a picture of Margaret and now have a very clear understanding of where my blue gray eyes with the dark rim around the iris came from.  I have the eyes of either a Heffernan or O’Connor.
  14. The Heffernan name is misspelled in so many ways – Hefron, Hefen, Hefferen, etc.  Online searching is a nightmare
  15. No Land Records or a Will were found at the courthouse.
  16. Ellen is buried at the Catholic Cemetery in Seymour, but no headstone or location of burial plot was found.  No burial card, nothing.  The cemetery caretaker told me that the Irish were discriminated against at that time, and even the priest wasn’t interested in keeping proper records.  Sigh.
  17. I have a subscription to Find My Past.  They have a large database of Irish birth records in Limerick.  In looking for any Ellen Heffernan’s born to a mother named Bridget around May, 1829, there are a couple of options.  But none of the father’s listed were either John, Michael or James.  Another lovely needle in a haystack.



In conclusion, I still think my biggest clues are as follows:
  • She was born in the month of May
  • Her mother was named Bridget
  • Possible siblings include Bridget, Ann, Mary, Patrick and Michael
  • Patrick Heffernan says he was from County Limerick



My plan is to go back thru the Connecticut Catholic Church records one more time next year, and look at every entry from 1850 thru 1880 in 3 local churches.  I will look at misspelled names, sponsors of every baby born, and witnesses at every marriage to see if Ellen’s name is listed.

Beyond that, I am out of ideas.  But I cannot quit and will never stop thinking about her.  So offer up any ideas and suggestions on where you think I have missed a clue. 

I have prizes, awards, and a lifetime of accolades for the person the can help me figure this out.

Thank God I was born in the 20th Century



I thank god every day for the fact that I was NOT born in the 1800’s (or before).  If there is one thing I can gain from my addiction to genealogy, it’s an appreciation for what I have in this lifetime.

My Top 10 Reasons for Why I am Grateful for being born in the 20th Century:

1.     Hair Dryers – oh boy would I be ugly without my hair dryer
2.     Air Conditioning – oh boy would I be crabby without air conditioning
3.     Indoor Plumbing – no explanation needed
4.     Planes, Trains and Automobiles – my other addiction is traveling.  I really don’t care where I go as long as I have a vacation in the works.  To think people never left their hometown is very sad to me.
5.     Drive Thru Fast Food – I love it that I never have to get out of my car to buy lunch.
6.     Pants – The outfits that women wore in the 1800’s were ridiculous.  Those poor women in humid Louisiana!
7.     Birth Control – sorry, but I’m not interested in having 16 children over a span of 20 years.  Throw in outhouses for when you feel ill, and I would have run away
8.     The Internet – it’s made searching for my ancestors a breeze
9.     Modern Medicine – How did they handle allergies to ragweed?  Sneeze all day for a month?
  1.  Equal Rights – again, no explanation needed

Adoptees: Using DNA and Social Media to Find Your Birth Parents



About 18 months ago, I was contacted by an adoptee who had been trying to find her birth parents since 1984.  To start your search at the age of 30 and keep up the hunt for another 30 years must be the ultimate feeling of resignation and wonder.  Yet thanks to the emerging science of using DNA by adoptees, and a creative use of Social Media, I am thrilled to say that she now knows who her birth mother is and has 5 new siblings.  The icing on the cake is that she also knows her lineage brings her to the Sokolov region of the Czech Republic. 

How did we do it?

We were presented with the only documents that she had gathered over the years – the original birth certificate from Chicago, adoption papers and a letter from Catholic Charities.  The OBC had a mother’s name, but the father’s name was filled in with the words “legally omitted”.  The other small clues given to us by Catholic Charities were that the mother was 23 years old, from a small town in Wisconsin and of Czech descent; while the birth father was of Irish descent.  That was all I had to work with.

Thus, I began by setting up a tree and searching for quite some time to find any females born in Wisconsin with the given name from the OBC.  After finding a few candidates with this name, sadly I was able to locate all of them and cross them off the list.  It became apparent that some facts within the OBC were falsified, if not all of them (which is very common).  The address on the Birth Certificate didn’t help us either because it led us back to a former location for Catholic Charities.  These dead ends meant that DNA was more important than ever.

So we patiently waited to get her DNA results back from Ancestry.com, which confirmed that 44% of her DNA was Eastern Europe, 20% Ireland and 15% Western Europe.  However, the closest match was a 3rd – 4th cousin.  3rd cousin matches means you probably share the same 2x Great Grandparent, and 4th cousins mean you probably share the same 3x Great Grandparent.  Because that takes us back over 150 years, you then must forward reconstruct the tree on all branches to find a candidate for a parent.  With limited clues, and the daunting # of branches, this makes it difficult to pinpoint a family of interest. 

After waiting an entire year, we finally got a 2nd cousin match.  Now it gets interesting because as I set up the tree for this match, it became clear this person was 100% Czech from the Chicago area.  I was on a roll, setting up all branches and building it back with helpful records from the Cook County Illinois area – Naturalizations, online vital indexes, Chicago Tribune Obits, and more.  But as I got back to the 1930 era (when the birth mother was born), I found one Great Uncle to our match that was living in a very small town in Wisconsin (population was less than 1000).   And this Great Uncle had a daughter born in 1928, who was of high interest.  All fitting to our Catholic Charity clues.  If this is our mother, we know this DNA match is a perfect 2nd cousin match to the adoptee.

Since this family was the only one found living in a small town in Wisconsin, I urged our adoptee to reach out to the children of this woman of interest.  I found the birth mother’s obituary that named her children and spouses.  Thus, I was able to locate a daughter thru Facebook.  It is thru this initial contact that she began to communicate with the family.  Eventually, they offered to take a DNA test so we could determine a relationship.  When the results arrived, Ancestry predicted a “Close – 1st Cousin” Match.  To confirm these findings, I downloaded the Raw DNA for both the adoptee and the potential sister, and then uploaded it to GEDMATCH where we performed a 1 to 1 comparison.  The results showed that they shared 29% of their DNA.  This is a perfect range for sisters that share one parent. 

It is only because of the generosity of this potential sister that we were able to confirm the birth mother.  Now this part of the journey is over for the adoptee and a new journey begins to get to know her new-found family.  

And oh yes, we still need to find the birth father.  The search never truly ends……………




ANNE FRANK MAKES CERTAIN THE HOLOCAUST WILL NEVER BE FORGOTTEN

This newspaper article was written by our father, Thomas F. Driscoll, about a year before his retirement after 46 years working as a journalist for the Peoria Journal Star.  He was obsessed with Anne Frank and her story.  All of his life, he wanted to visit her home in Amsterdam, more than he wanted to visit Ireland, the land of his ancestors.  He got his wish, wrote this story, and today is probably bugging her from above for a live sit-down interview.  We have transcribed the newspaper article exactly as it appeared in the paper on Sunday, June 3, 1990.





Reminder  At 263 Prinsengracht, Anne Frank makes certain the Holocaust will never be forgotten


Written by Thomas F. Driscoll
Peoria Journal Star, June 3, 1990


AMSTERDAM – It’s painful standing on the sidewalk outside of Anne Frank’s home, knowing she used to play hopscotch there with her friends.

Across the street, the triangular park is still there, the place where the kids used to turn cartwheels and do handstands, something Anne could never master, much to her chagrin.

Around the corner is the same bookstore where her father bought the diary with the red-and-white cover that he gave her for her 13th birthday, the one in which she wrote her way to immortality.

A month after she got the diary, the family one morning in July, 1942, walked the three miles in the rain to the secret Annex, where they hid for more than two years until the Nazis – German and Dutch – found them and sent them off to die.  Eight people hid together in the Annex, and the only one who survived Hitler’s death machine was Anne’s father, Otto Frank.  He was a German Army officer in World War 1 who fled Germany with his family in 1933 when Hitler took power and his hatred of Jews became public policy.

Something like half a million people now go through the tiny rooms of the Secret Annex every year, trying to visualize what it was like for the eight people to share the confinement and the fear for the 25 months.  The eight had this in common:  they all were Jews, and they were taking the only option open to them to escape the concentration camps.

The Frank family – father Otto, mother Edith, older sister Margot and younger sister Anne – went into hiding after Margot, who was 16, got a postcard ordering her to appear for shipment to a Dutch work camp, which was the first stop on the way to death.  By the end of World War II, something like 120,000 Dutch Jews had been killed by the Germans for the crime of being Jewish.  Only about 25,000, Otto Frank being one of them, survived.

Anne Frank lives on as a symbol of the Nazi horror because she was a gifted and prolific writer even though just a child.  She kept a diary from the day of the family’s confinement, when she was 13, until they were arrested when she was 15, not knowing she was writing for posterity.

She didn’t just keep a diary but also wrote many stories and sketches that were found in the hiding place after the police had gone.  They demonstrate a remarkable talent for one so young, but that is not what has given her writing its impact.

Her diary made the world see that Hitler’s victims were not just incomprehensible statistics, such as six million Jews gassed, shot, tortured and starved to death, but people with names, families, dreams – even little children plucked out of school and sent away to be killed.  Anne Frank left a record that personalized the Holocaust.  Her diary has sold more than 20 million copies and been translated into 50 languages.

Walking through the Secret Annex is chilling.  It would be more so, no doubt, to do it alone, for in the never-ending line of visitors the sense of isolation and fear get submerged.

The building, at 263 Prinsengracht, along one of Amsterdam’s many canals, is a narrow structure four stories high.  It was the place where Mr. Frank ran his business, selling pectin for jam and later spices of various kinds, and the Annex was an unused portion in the rear.

To get to it, you climb narrow, steep stairways to the third level, go down a long hallway, and there is the now-famous bookcase, hinged to the wall and pulled aside to reveal the door to the hiding place.  Go through it and you are in Mr. and Mrs. Frank’s room, where Margot also slept, and where Anne’s room, which she had to share with a dentist who went into hiding too.

Anne used to cut pictures of American movie stars from magazines and put them on the wall of her room.  They are still there – Deanna Durbin, Jean Arthur, and all the others.  She fantasized about becoming an actress and wrote a short story about a girl she named Anne Franklin, who wrote to actress Priscilla Lane, who invited her to Hollywood.  She went, but was disillusioned by life there and happily returned home.

Next to Anne’s room is the common washroom that they all shared, a sink and a flush toilet, something they could never use except at night because not all of the workers in the building knew of their presence.

Upstairs is the room of the Van Daan family, including their teenage son, Peter, with whom Anne gradually fell in love.  Who else, after all, was there for her to fall in love with since none of the eight people ever set foot outside of the Annex in two years and no other children ever came in?

Outside the window of Anne’s room, the big horse chestnut tree that she loved to watch as the seasons changed is still there, bigger than ever.  A few doors up the Prinsengracht canal, the church bell tolls in the Westerkerk – the same bell the prisoners listened to day and night for all those months.

To the adults, the confinement was dreadful.  Anne alone seemed able to make it into an adventure, something to write stories about in the future.  She wanted to write, she said, because “I want to go on living even after my death,” never realizing that death was imminent.

Most of the time in the Annex she was happy.  One day, after being confined for a year and a half, she wrote in her diary:  “I looked out of the open window, over a large piece of Amsterdam, over all the roofs and on to the far distance, fading into purple.  As long as this exists, I thought, and I may live to see it, this sunshine, the cloudless skies, while this lasts I cannot be unhappy.”

Six months later, she and all the others were arrested, betrayed by someone never identified for certain.  Six months after that, starving and in rags, Anne died of typhus in the German concentration camp at Bergen-Belsen.  Margot died there too, a few days before Anne, in February or March, 1945, only a couple of weeks before the camp was liberated.  Mrs. Van Daan died in one of the camps too.  Mrs. Frank died of starvation in Auschwitz, where Mr. Van Daan was gassed.  The dentist died in Neuengamme.  Peter was among those marched from Auschwitz by the SS when the Russians approached, and he died in Mauthausen on the very day the camp was liberated by Americans.  Mr. Frank was freed from Auschwitz by Russian troops.

All eight of the prisoners had left Holland on the last train that took Jews to Auschwitz.  Two months after Margot and Anne Frank died, the war ended and the Netherlands was free again.

Amsterdam, or rather the Anne Frank Foundation, has done a good job keeping the Secret Annex available to tourists without letting it become tawdry.  Located in the center of the city, it is easy to find and to get to – and profoundly moving.

There is nothing in Amsterdam, however, to mark where the Frank family lived before abandoning the apartment and entering the Annex.  Their home was at 37 Merwedeplein, which is a V-shaped street around two sides of a triangular park on the south side of Amsterdam.  No plaque or statue or any kind of memento exists there, but the apartment building looks largely the same as it did when the Franks lived there on the third floor (known as the second floor in Amsterdam, where the ground floor is not counted as the first).

Because it has not been made into a tourist attraction, it is a more profitable place to go, to sit on a bench in solitude in the park where Anne and her friends used to play, and meditate on how all these unspeakable crimes could have happened, even to children, in the lifetimes of many of us.


And to wonder whether it could happen again – in what we like to refer to as western civilization.
____________________________________________

Thomas Driscoll is executive editor of the Journal Star.  He was in Amsterdam last month.





EARLY ADOPTIONS, ORPHANAGES AND GUARDIANSHIPS = Amazing Stories Related to our Hardest Family Brick Walls

All family mysteries are interesting to me, but it is always the Early Adoption stories that grab my attention and send me on an unexpected journey.  I call them “Early Adoptions” because they took place long after the Adoptee has passed away, and require creative legwork to figure out where to look since the records are old and laws may not have been in existence.  These Early Adoptions are muddied by the fact that courthouses burned or flooded, family stories handed down are manipulated to hide the truth, laws were not passed yet requiring a paper trail, and basically people were too ashamed to talk about it.

Heartbreaking for sure.  But all mysteries can be solved.

Here are some of our most interesting adoption cases that we have worked on to date:

1.  Giulia was an Italian woman born about 1878 and the family believed she was adopted in Chicago Illinois after escaping Italy due to a fear for her life.  After researching her family, I discovered that Giulia was born in Calvello Italy.  I had the good luck of finding the online birth records for this small town, but they were written in Italian, not English.  I don’t speak Italian.  So I literally went thru the records by hand looking for 3 names that I could read = the name Giulia or her adopted parent’s Rosaria and Nicolai.   I still cannot believe what I stumbled across.  After spending an entire day flipping thru about 5 years of births, I found a record at the back of the book where special cases were written about.




Note the name on the left says Giulia.  The top row on the right shows the name Rosaria.  I had a translator in Italy read the document and tell me the following:
This is the birth record (#14) for Giulia Agrifoglio
Rosaria, a 23 year old seamstress, is not declaring that she is the mother, but that she found the infant. She presents the infant to the official who gives the infant the name Giulia, and the surname [cognome] Agrifoglio. This was usually a "made-up" name and not found in the town.
I believe Rosaria requested that the child be left in her care.  No mother or father is identified... that is why you see "Esposita" under Giulia's name in the left column where you would normally see the parents' names.


It is an amazing discovery but unfortunately one that probably means the family will never know who her real parents are.

2.  An infant named Nellie was adopted in Indiana around 1885.  She supposedly searched a few times in her life to find her birth family but with no luck.  128 years later, her great granddaughter took it upon herself to try to research the birth, but also hit a brick wall.  So she contacted us for help.  After spending several frustrating hours without finding any records, I searched for and found an orphanage in the town where the family lived.  There it was, Nellie’s record of being taken home by her adopted father, and it named the birth mother and birth grandmother who had dropped her off. 

3.  A baby named Joseph was born out of wedlock in Boston around 1924.  We were lucky enough to know the birth mother’s name, but the family could not figure out where she was after the birth.  I was able to locate a simple obituary for Joseph’s birth grandfather, which named the birth mother and her new married name.  All the pieces fell together and we located 11 living cousins for the family to reach out to. 

4.  One of my most interesting and frustrating cases was a son who told me the story about his mother being switched at birth in Quebec around 1929.  She was told the harrowing story after her “adopted” father passed away, and the details were that her real birth parents were unmarried from the United States.  On the same day of her birth, in the same hospital, a son was born to the adopted parents but died because he was a hemophiliac.  The doctor agreed to switch the babies and no records existed.  My research uncovered her baptism to the adopted parents that raised her in Quebec, but no death record of the hemophiliac son.  To date, we do not know who the real parents are.

5.  This month, we just helped a woman in Minnesota figure out the real birth father of her Irish great grandfather James.  Her brick wall was based on a family story that James was told upon his mother’s death that the father he grew up with was not his birth father.  In fact, James’ mother was previously married, gave the first 2 sons away who died in the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, and kept baby James before getting remarried.  With only this story to go on, we scoured through the local courthouse and Catholic Church, and found a vital record entry of her 2nd marriage noting her name as Mrs.  That told us she was a widow.  The client immediately found his death record in the 1870 US Federal Census Mortality Schedules of 1870.  We have not found what happened to the other 2 children born to this couple and even researched local Guardianship records in the County Courthouse.  Sadly it appears the story may be true.   Our next step is to research the cemeteries in Chicago for a burial record since a certificate of death was not found for either son.

6.  Then there is our own family story where my father found out his mother was adopted on the night she passed away.  After spending an entire year digging through Cook County courthouse records, I found the birth mother had actually taken my grandmother home for the first year in 1900, gave her to the “adopted” father in 1901, and would occasionally visit her in Chicago until she moved away before 1910.  By 1911, she agreed to let the official adoption take place, and then remarried the next month.  She died in Twin Falls Idaho.  But the most amazing part was the whispers that the adopted father was actually the birth father.  So we found a living descendant of his sister, and she agreed to take a DNA test.  It came back as a strong 3rd cousin, confirming that he was actually the real father but had to adopt her because he was not listed on the birth certificate.  Thank God for DNA.  Read the full story at the link below:



7.  Today, we have taken on an adoption case that takes us back to Nova Scotia Canada.  It will be very difficult to research foreign records from the 1880’s but we are ready for the challenge.  Fingers crossed for success.



Ancestry Sisters has started a new Facebook page called Adoption Genealogy.  This is a community to help answer questions on how and where to research your family's mysteries related to Early Adoptions, Orphanages, and Guardianships.  Follow us, LIKE our page and ask questions on the link below.  


CHICAGO IRISH GENEALOGY

Announcing a new Facebook Page = Chicago Irish Genealogy

We are here to help you research your Irish ancestors who lived in Chicago, Illinois.  Click on the link below, follow us and post questions.  




Chicago Genealogy & Cook County Genealogy

* How to Research your Chicago Ancestors *

Chicago has such a rich history, and is so ethnically diverse, that it just begs you to search all the various goldmines around the city for clues to solving your family mysteries.  Immigrants flooded the city in the mid to late 1800’s, which helped to shape the Chicago that we know and love today.   Your ancestors could have helped build the railroads, rebuild the city after the 1871 Great Chicago Fire, and design and build the Chicago World’s Fair of 1893, also known as the White City. 



There is a lot to learn about Chicago Genealogy and what is available to research, but here are some of my favorite resources and what they can tell you:

Chicago Vital Records – After 1871, vital records are available and fairly easy to research.  The challenge is that death and marriage records before 1900 do not name parents.  But other clues can be gathered, including where the person lived on a birth or death certificate, or whether the person was married in a church or by the Justice of the Peace.   And the Illinois index of early marriages and deaths is a great resource, especially for finding misspelled names. 

Church Records – While the Great Chicago Fire destroyed all vital records before 1871, Church Records help to fill in those early blanks and can take you back as early as 1850.   Certain Catholic Churches even kept records that identified where the person was born and when.  This is especially true in the Italian and Polish ethnic churches.   

Cemetery Records – Not only can you find the date of death, but headstones can include place of birth, year of birth and if lucky, where they were born.  You can also see who they are buried with, or near, for major clues.  Don’t just rely on Find a Grave.  Go visit the cemetery in person.  One of my favorite stories is how I began to research the Catholic Cemetery of Calvary in Evanston.  I started out by pulling the cemetery record of my Irish Great Great Grandmother.  What I uncovered was a burial plot with 8 people in the same grave.  Then it spiraled out of control - who were these people buried with my Julia who died in 1884?  Over a period of about a year, I bet I went back to this cemetery 25 times, becoming fast friends with the office manager.  But my biggest discovery was finding my 3x Great Grandfather from Quebec who was buried in the same plot with his grandson.  I had no idea he even came to the US and never thought to search vital records for him.  Without searching for his grandson’s cemetery record, I would have never found him in Chicago.   

Voter Registrations of 1888, 1890 and 1892 – These records identify the courthouse where the person was naturalized, how long the person lived in Chicago, how long they lived in Illinois, and their current address.  It is often in alphabetical order by last name so it can help you see other potential family members.  This is a great replacement for the destroyed 1890 Federal Census.

City Directories & Telephone Directories – Published books began around 1839 and help you plot the areas where your family lived, and when they moved.  These addresses help you define nearby relatives and what churches they may have attended.

Ward Maps – The city was constantly changing its street names and ward boundaries.  It’s important to identify where your ancestors lived, but that can also be a challenge.  Sometimes they lived in the same house on multiple census records, but the street names are different.  Ward maps can help you figure out these changes.

Census Records – Chicago census records show the street a person lived on starting in the 1880 census. 

Naturalization Records – There are 3 places where an individual could have been naturalized in Cook County:  Circuit Court, Superior Court and District Court.  The first 2 are found at the Daley Center, while the District Court filings are found at the NARA Great Lakes Region.

Immigration – the Newberry Library houses many books on ethnic immigration that has an index of names, making it easier to find often misspelled names. 

NARA Great Lakes Region – This repository houses the District Court Naturalization records of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio and Wisconsin, along with many other court records.

Divorce Records – While records are off-site, once you find an index of a divorce, the record is a goldmine for information.  The divorce of my adopted Grandmother’s birth mother led to naming her sister as a witness in the trial.  That led to helping me find where the birth mother ended up dying, and ultimately where she was born.

Probates – Again, these records are kept off-site.  If an index is found for that person, then it takes up to 2 weeks for them to arrive for viewing.

Land Records – Did your ancestors own the property they were living in and for how long?  That can be found by researching land records. 

Adoptions, Orphanages and Guardianships – There are various ways to research this difficult area of your tree.   Illinois adoptee birth records prior to 1946 can now be obtained by family.  Also, Catholic Charities can be helpful in finding records at a Catholic Orphanage.  Guardianship Records in Cook County can be viewed on microfilm, and census records can be combed for children living at local orphanages. 

Autopsy Records – These records don’t necessarily lead to family clues, but are interesting and help shape the stories of a person’s life.

Newspaper Obituaries – The challenge with early obituaries in Chicago is that the city had so many people dying on any given day, that the obits were just kept to the basics.  Unless the person was of prominence or had an interesting life story, the most you can get from them are maiden names, children, if the person was single or married, along with what church they attended and where the burial will take place.  On a few obituaries, it will tell you what country they were born, but that is rare.

Libraries – Several key libraries are essential to finding nuggets of Genealogy information:  Newberry Library, Harold Washington Library, Family History Library, and Northeastern Illinois University Library


If any of your ancestors lived in Chicago, or even had a brief stay in this great city, then I strongly encourage you research them immediately.  My simple advice is to never give up until you exhaust all avenues available to you.  Based on my years of experience in Chicago, it can be an expansive yet rewarding search.